Author Topic: Optoma UHZ65 VS JVC7900 VS SONY VW360ES VS QLED VS OLED  (Read 4055 times)

Offline sypderman88

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • Posts: 258
Re: Optoma UHZ65 VS JVC7900 VS SONY VW360ES VS QLED VS OLED
« Reply #30 on: July 03, 2018, 16:38 »
Bro,

 Have you seen JVC eshift 4 or eshift 5 PJ ? Go demo. Combined with the higher JVC contrasts and better lens it is quite sharp for video.  I have no problems with Planet II PQ compared to my Samsung SUHD 4K TV.

Offline Amon86

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Snr Member
  • Posts: 76
Re: Optoma UHZ65 VS JVC7900 VS SONY VW360ES VS QLED VS OLED
« Reply #31 on: July 03, 2018, 18:26 »
Bro,

 Have you seen JVC eshift 4 or eshift 5 PJ ? Go demo. Combined with the higher JVC contrasts and better lens it is quite sharp for video.  I have no problems with Planet II PQ compared to my Samsung SUHD 4K TV.

Anyways bro...I am happy on my current one....maybe next time i thinking of upgrading might try but by the time maybe got 8k laser for sony liao cause for visual i seldom change so fast.....for audio side i always once 1-2 year might change something....my old 55" tv also 6 years liao haven't change that time brought $4899 that time premium model nowadays got oled,qled visual technology always changing cannot catch finish....but for speakers and stuff 6-8 years then got updates

Offline badbad2000

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • Posts: 1101
Re: Optoma UHZ65 VS JVC7900 VS SONY VW360ES VS QLED VS OLED
« Reply #32 on: July 03, 2018, 20:33 »
Actually 4k blurays like the Planet Earth II, Blue Planet II does show the power of 4K very clearly if you are using native than pixel shift....if you are watching those remaster to 4KDI content or 2K contents then you can't tell the differences

Blue Planet II capture by iphone
   

Concert bluray 1080p Upscaling to 4K by Oppo 205


The photo cant view in tapatalk


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline badbad2000

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • Posts: 1101
Re: Optoma UHZ65 VS JVC7900 VS SONY VW360ES VS QLED VS OLED
« Reply #33 on: July 03, 2018, 20:35 »
Anyways bro...I am happy on my current one....maybe next time i thinking of upgrading might try but by the time maybe got 8k laser for sony liao cause for visual i seldom change so fast.....for audio side i always once 1-2 year might change something....my old 55" tv also 6 years liao haven't change that time brought $4899 that time premium model nowadays got oled,qled visual technology always changing cannot catch finish....but for speakers and stuff 6-8 years then got updates

Me too. Visual also dont chnage often. Speakers also dont change often.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline badbad2000

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • Posts: 1101
Re: Optoma UHZ65 VS JVC7900 VS SONY VW360ES VS QLED VS OLED
« Reply #34 on: July 03, 2018, 20:37 »
Hi,
 
 Just to share I currently owned JVC X5900. Previously is Sony HW40es. PQ jump is huge. However to fully realize JVC contrast and black level you need a bat cave.
  Have looked into Sony 4K offerings but since my main application is movie and in a bat cave, the more competitively priced JVC is my preference. Btw only the 360es with the dynamic iris is a closer to JVC in black level.
 

If no bat cave but with ALR screen?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline Amon86

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Snr Member
  • Posts: 76
Re: Optoma UHZ65 VS JVC7900 VS SONY VW360ES VS QLED VS OLED
« Reply #35 on: July 03, 2018, 21:59 »
The photo cant view in tapatalk


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Shot using Four-third micro

Black level

Offline badbad2000

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • Posts: 1101
Re: Optoma UHZ65 VS JVC7900 VS SONY VW360ES VS QLED VS OLED
« Reply #36 on: July 03, 2018, 22:58 »
Shot using Four-third micro

Black level


This is 4k concert?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline Amon86

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Snr Member
  • Posts: 76
Re: Optoma UHZ65 VS JVC7900 VS SONY VW360ES VS QLED VS OLED
« Reply #37 on: July 03, 2018, 23:04 »
This is 4k concert?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No Bluray upscale to 4K from Oppo 205

Offline badbad2000

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • Posts: 1101
Re: Optoma UHZ65 VS JVC7900 VS SONY VW360ES VS QLED VS OLED
« Reply #38 on: July 03, 2018, 23:09 »
No Bluray upscale to 4K from Oppo 205

Still very nice


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline Amon86

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Snr Member
  • Posts: 76
Re: Optoma UHZ65 VS JVC7900 VS SONY VW360ES VS QLED VS OLED
« Reply #39 on: July 03, 2018, 23:16 »
Still very nice


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Thanks here's another shot


Offline sypderman88

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • Posts: 258
Re: Optoma UHZ65 VS JVC7900 VS SONY VW360ES VS QLED VS OLED
« Reply #40 on: July 04, 2018, 10:45 »
Wahh..the blacks not bad but it does not have the sharpness and microdetails of native 4K..look at the skins, clothes textures etc.. A very good video to use is the TV series , the Expanse. Get the 4k version for season 1 and season 2.
The level of 4k microdetails are insane and the best I have seen. It is really a showcase for 4K microdetails and being a sci-fi show in space, it is really how good yr projector handles shadow details and black level...the show is also not bad

Offline Amon86

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Snr Member
  • Posts: 76
Re: Optoma UHZ65 VS JVC7900 VS SONY VW360ES VS QLED VS OLED
« Reply #41 on: July 04, 2018, 16:25 »
Wahh..the blacks not bad but it does not have the sharpness and microdetails of native 4K..look at the skins, clothes textures etc.. A very good video to use is the TV series , the Expanse. Get the 4k version for season 1 and season 2.
The level of 4k microdetails are insane and the best I have seen. It is really a showcase for 4K microdetails and being a sci-fi show in space, it is really how good yr projector handles shadow details and black level...the show is also not bad

As i say...the following images are bluray 1080p upscale to 4k surely it doesn't have those....as you can only see those on a 4K bluray with 4kDI but to me wasn't bad liao not trying to proof anything here....of course camera capture is not as nice as you see it real for yourself...i capture a scene on blue planet II with a iphone on a polar bear it's sux compare to a 4-third micro shot photo....i even got a DSLR as well anyways i don't wanna compare camera picture quality

Offline badbad2000

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • Posts: 1101
Re: Optoma UHZ65 VS JVC7900 VS SONY VW360ES VS QLED VS OLED
« Reply #42 on: July 04, 2018, 22:10 »
Wahh..the blacks not bad but it does not have the sharpness and microdetails of native 4K..look at the skins, clothes textures etc.. A very good video to use is the TV series , the Expanse. Get the 4k version for season 1 and season 2.
The level of 4k microdetails are insane and the best I have seen. It is really a showcase for 4K microdetails and being a sci-fi show in space, it is really how good yr projector handles shadow details and black level...the show is also not bad

I watched expanse too. Good series.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline badbad2000

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • Posts: 1101
Re: Optoma UHZ65 VS JVC7900 VS SONY VW360ES VS QLED VS OLED
« Reply #43 on: January 11, 2019, 01:14 »
upgraded UHZ65 Vastly improved wide color gamut, up to 80% of BT2020 for dramatically vibrant images.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QWlksKFGUlI

and the video look like have better black too.